The whole index at a glance.
The index is grouped and sorted around the key thing about a workspace: what it's for. To work that out, we match each repository's own name, description and README against a fixed lexicon.
By subject 925 originals
| Subject | Entries | |
|---|---|---|
| LLM wiki | 235 | |
| General-purpose | 229 | |
| Second brain | 193 | |
| Job hunt | 110 | |
| Software development | 94 | |
| Professional & finance | 41 | |
| Research & science | 36 | |
| Product management | 32 | |
| Content & marketing | 26 | |
| Productivity & assistant | 26 | |
| Teaching & study | 16 |
Two subjects hold 50% of the original projects. General-purpose is where a repo that names no subject lands. Splitting the two dominant shelves was measured and declined: their candidate sub-labels overlap more than the top-level subjects do.
Families 8 with five or more members
Most entries stand alone. These are the ones people copied.
Where the rest sit
| Originals | 925 |
| Copies, reachable through the original they came from | 441 |
| Entries nobody has copied | 828 |
| Moved in the last month | 575 |
| Archived by their owner | 8 |